On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 21:47:47 +0100, Denis Leroy <denis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 11/02/2009 07:18 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > >That may be true, but since cdrecord is not shippable, it's a pretty > >vacuous truth. > > Out of curiosity, was that just because of the GPL2-CDDL mix ? Or > was there another reason ? Last I checked, only mkisofs is affected > by that and the rest of cdrecord is pure CDDL. If we patched mkisofs > away, would it be shippable ? There is also the issue that Jörg wants devices to be referenced in a particular way that most other developers don't want to do. So a fork may be needed even if licensing is resolved. It doesn't sound like fun work though. I get the impression that there are a lot of device quirks and without sample hardware and a fair amount of dedication it is going to be hard to do a good job. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
