Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/29/2009 07:52 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
>> By no means did I interpret that at all... but here lies the
>> problem... I had no idea I would  have to convenience *anybody*
>> of *anything* because I thought I made the dead line... again all
>> following was the schedule in:
>>         http://www.linux-archive.org/fedora-development/372823-all-features-need-100-beta-freeze-2009-09-29-a.html
>>
>> And Today I am %100 finished... Please point out which part of that
>> did I misinterpret, because the last thing I want to do is cause problems...
>>
> 
> Because we do seem to fight this problem every release.  Was anyone else
> confused about when the deadline was?  It seems very clear to me, on
> several occasions, when features needed to be in by.
What dead line did I miss?? The deadline in above email said to be %100 
by today... I am %100 done today... Believe I wish I was %100 percent done
two weeks ago... Life would have much easier... 

> 
> What more could we have done to make this more clear?  I understand what
> that one email says, but there's several others that clarify.
This is by far the best question asked so far... I have thought about
this since I've gotten this (very unexpected) reaction... 

Please, if you don't mind, which emails are you referring to, because I
really want to know what I missed and how I missed... 

steved.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux