Re: Non-responsive maintainer process for kurzawa / Krzysztof Kurzawski

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, Jon Stanley <jonstanley@xxxxxxxxx> said:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Neither am I. Yet I do all I can to stay reachable.
> 
> Right, but even still, I don't really think that "you're not online
> for a week, you're gone!" is the right approach.  There are probably a
> good many packagers that don't check in once a week or more.  Not the
> case for you or I obviously, but I wouldn't discount that they exist.

I only have 2 minor packages (both of which will probably not change
again), so it isn't a big deal for me, but I would say one week is too
short.  I was recently on vacation for a week where I barely had time to
look at a computer (Dragon*Con, where I was on staff).  I checked my
email at most once a day, and I certainly wouldn't have been able to do
any package work during that time.

In a couple of weeks, I get to report to a US district court for jury
duty for "approximately two weeks" in a small town (that had a RHL beta
release series named after it!); who knows how much I'll be able to get
online during that time.

-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux