Re: Non-responsive maintainer process for kurzawa / Krzysztof Kurzawski

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/18/2009 09:33 PM, Jon Stanley wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Neither am I. Yet I do all I can to stay reachable.
> 
> Right, but even still, I don't really think that "you're not online
> for a week, you're gone!" is the right approach.  There are probably a
> good many packagers that don't check in once a week or more.  Not the
> case for you or I obviously, but I wouldn't discount that they exist.

So, what would be the right approach? The current policy seems deficient
or needs to be complimented by automated checks for activity. Monitoring
how many bug reports go unanswered by maintainers for example.

Rahul

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux