On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 19:34:27 +0200, Christoph wrote: > Am Samstag, den 12.09.2009, 10:13 +0200 schrieb Michael Schwendt: > > The non-responsive packager procedure could > > have been started _several_ months earlier. Perhaps one year ago already. > > IIRC it did. > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-August/msg00321.html Well, that confirms my point of view. According to that thread, he replied 9 days later, said he had been on vacation. He orphaned a few packages even. That single "sign of life" wiped away all the concerns. In August 2008. Now switch to April 2009. A provenpackager fixed bug 469602 in one of kurzawa's packages after six months without a comment, but not mentioned anything about the non-responsiveness. Perhaps they talked about it outside of bugzilla? Who knows? Then let's jump to June/July 2009. Bug Zapper's F9-EOL script closed tickets 455567 and 468626. The former has been without a comment for almost a year. It dates back to July 2008, which is around the time you were worried about the non-responsiveness and the state of some of the packages. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
