Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > IMHO, a consecutive week or longer without being online (there are usually > ways to check your mail when on vacation, if not, see the next point) and > with no preannouncement (that's what the Vacation page in the wiki is for!) > is enough to constitute non-responsiveness on its own You *seriously* need to get a life. The above sort of standard might be reasonable for people who were getting paid to do Fedora packaging, but a large fraction of Fedora packagers aren't. (Not that kurzawa doesn't seem to be well past the threshold of reasonable responsiveness. But people are allowed to take two-week vacations without having to answer to FESCO for it.) regards, tom lane -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
