On 09/16/2009 08:59 AM, Jochen Schmitt wrote: > Am 16.09.2009 17:47, schrieb Toshio Kuratomi: > >> That still leaves open the question of why no one has asked rsync >> upstream to make their fork publicly available instead of hoarding >> it as a private, internal copy. > > I would ask, why the modification will not integrated in the > 'official' Fedora zlib package? > > After this integration the fedora maintainer can forward the pach to > the upsream author. > I don't know -- varekova, what do you think of the rsync-zlib patch? http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2005-December/014180.html Does this look sane enough that you'd take it upstream? -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
