Re: status of forked zlibs in rsync and zsync

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 08:47 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Ah -- I was reading that as three separate options.  I can see how it
> could be read as three steps in a single solution as well.
> 
> That still leaves open the question of why no one has asked rsync
> upstream to make their fork publicly available instead of hoarding it
> as
> a private, internal copy.

I don't remember if the inquiry was public, but I think the answer was
the same as zsync (or the inquiry was simply ignored).

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux