On 09/15/2009 06:55 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 13:44 +0200, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote: >> Hey, >> >> I googled for it and found Karims blogpost and Simon aka kassamedias >> answer (comment 3) >> >> http://kparal.wordpress.com/2009/09/01/zsync-transfer-large-files-efficiently/ > > If we _really_ cared about doing this OAOO, we could probably get the > rsync package to drop out its own zlib copy as a shared lib, make that a > subpackage, and link zsync against that. > > But, for 74k of shared library, I just don't care that much. This > shouldn't block packaging zsync. > The rules against shared libraries aren't because of saving space:: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/No_Bundled_Libraries And yep, I agree with your analysis of how we can do this. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
