Re: status of forked zlibs in rsync and zsync

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 16.09.2009 17:47, schrieb Toshio Kuratomi:
>
> That still leaves open the question of why no one has asked rsync
> upstream to make their fork publicly available instead of hoarding
> it as a private, internal copy.
>
I would ask, why the modification will not integrated in the
'official' Fedora zlib package?

After this integration the fedora maintainer can forward the pach to
the upsream author.

Best Regards:

Jochen Schmitt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iJwEAQECAAYFAkqxC0kACgkQZLAIBz9lVu+zmQQAgHZTiLsAVbps6bCzXD+oHFhV
n1/vhtKc80KcxDTyHcw/yiiD43wewyz3EZtCJm1FV+x/TiqdKfroJa+9uExY/tVb
RImt9ZrclIS7p+t5AgKDFZ/oXigEfXew6ydkj5G6dP1wfrAFb1jb4qtdLO8cSdGD
vV5ldUkbOpDCtYH3+DE=
=Uw7o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux