Am Montag, den 17.08.2009, 16:29 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram: > On 08/17/2009 03:54 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > Am Montag, den 17.08.2009, 15:24 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram: > >> On 08/17/2009 03:22 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> Then you should also know that a buildroot overwrite for the other > >>> branches has been requested as well, so a simple rebuild should fix > >>> everything for those maintainers, who want to switch to openal-soft. > >> > >> The rebuild is *unnecessary*. > > > > It's on the maintainers (but not on you) to decide whether the rebuild > > is unnecessary or not. > > The maintainer of openal-soft has already admitted that the obsolete was > incorrect and fixed it in Fedora and Fedora 10 and informed me about it > offlist. Thomas is a first timer, who joined Fedora recently. Please don't judge him by your standards and please don't expect him to follow procedures that are not even outlined in the wiki. > I am a maintainer of a package (tremulous) affected by the > obsolete and I am not supposed to say that it is unnecessary to rebuild? You can only speak for yourself and your package, but not for other maintainers or packages. > That doesn't make any sense to me. What exactly are you fighting about > now? The problem is already solved. The problem is solved, but your incorrect statement about maintainers not being able to fix their packages was still not corrected on the list. I just wanted to correct that. I'm not fighting, I'm protecting a fellow friend of mine against unjustified accusations. > Rahul Regards, Christoph -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
