Re: Confusion with openal-soft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Montag, den 17.08.2009, 14:57 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> On 08/17/2009 02:23 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> 
> >> See my first mail on this thread.
> > 
> > I did , but it doesn't explain why maintainers shouldn't be able to fix
> > it.
> 
> How would they be able to fix it exactly? openal-soft earlier obsoleted
> openal in the stable branches. openal-soft maintainer also filed bug
> reports asking all the maintainers to rebuild the packages that depended
> openal in Rawhide, Fedora 11 and Fedora 10. A rebuild is only possible
> in Rawhide since openal-soft is not in the build root for other
> branches. All this information is already in the bug report I linked to
> in the original mail.

Then you should also know that a buildroot overwrite for the other
branches has been requested as well, so a simple rebuild should fix
everything for those maintainers, who want to switch to openal-soft.

Regards,
Christoph

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux