Am Montag, den 17.08.2009, 10:32 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram: > On 08/17/2009 04:50 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > Am Montag, den 17.08.2009, 00:02 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram: > >> On 08/16/2009 11:07 PM, LinuxDonald wrote: > >>> Only the devel packages conflicts. > >> > >> Just in case, it is not clear. You have broken every package that > >> depends on openal in Fedora 11 and Fedora 10 and there is no way for the > >> package maintainers to fix it. > > > > Why is there no way to fix it??? > > See my first mail on this thread. I did , but it doesn't explain why maintainers shouldn't be able to fix it. > >> Are you going to cancel the openal-soft to push to these branches? > > > > AFAIC it's delayed until dependencies are rebuilt. > > It got fixed by not obsoleting openal in the stable branches. So where is the problem then? I don't understand the bother. > Rahul Regards, Christoph -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
