On 08/17/2009 02:23 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote: >> See my first mail on this thread. > > I did , but it doesn't explain why maintainers shouldn't be able to fix > it. How would they be able to fix it exactly? openal-soft earlier obsoleted openal in the stable branches. openal-soft maintainer also filed bug reports asking all the maintainers to rebuild the packages that depended openal in Rawhide, Fedora 11 and Fedora 10. A rebuild is only possible in Rawhide since openal-soft is not in the build root for other branches. All this information is already in the bug report I linked to in the original mail. >>>> Are you going to cancel the openal-soft to push to these branches? >>> >>> AFAIC it's delayed until dependencies are rebuilt. >> >> It got fixed by not obsoleting openal in the stable branches. > > So where is the problem then? I don't understand the bother. It got fixed only later. For a while all the packages that depended on openal was broken in multiple branches. Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
