Re: Confusion with openal-soft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/17/2009 03:57 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:24:38 +0530, Rahul wrote:
> 
>> On 08/17/2009 03:22 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Then you should also know that a buildroot overwrite for the other
>>> branches has been requested as well, so a simple rebuild should fix
>>> everything for those maintainers, who want to switch to openal-soft.
>>
>> The rebuild is *unnecessary*. The obsolete was added *incorrectly* for
>> the stable branches and has been fixed now. Read the bug report I
>> referenced in the original mail before replying.
> 
> You two are talking past eachother IMO. As I understand it,
> Christoph refers to anyone who wishes to (re)build with the new
> openal-soft packages, regardless of whether it must be done or not.

I know the process to do it if it was necessary to do so. It is simply
not applicable in the current situation since the obsolete was added
incorrectly.

Rahul

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux