Adam Williamson wrote:
> A good example of the weirdness here - we're declaring KDE 4.3 a 'Fedora
> 12 feature' (implying it's something sufficiently potentially
> problematic that it needs a specific test plan and contingency plan),
> yet backporting it to Fedora 10 as an official update meets with
> widespread approval and 'nothing wrong with that!' comments...
IMHO there should be a process to promote features in updates (but I didn't
get much consensus for that when I suggested it in FESCo).
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
