On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 10:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > I think the correct question here is why has a perfectly routine version > bump for components included in Fedora been submitted as a 'feature'? If > GNOME 2.28 is a feature, isn't KDE 4.3 a feature (oh, I see it is too, > lovely...), kernel 2.6.31 a feature...every new version of everything in > the distro a feature? What benefit does applying the feature process to > a routine update like this bring, to offset its clear inconsistency? "routine version bump" may actually introduce new and exciting features, and may need coordination across a wide range of users and testers. Ergo, Fedora Feature. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
