On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 20:30 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 00:56 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > I'll make sure one of the Desktop-y guys updates this (presumably > > Matthias). > > > > I've updated it recently and bumped it to 75%. It would seem > disingenuous to bump it to 100% when GNOME 2.28 has not been released > yet. > > It is fine for the feature wrangler to propose it for removal. But I > certainly hope that Fesco will not only look at pretty meaningless > percentages, but at precedents and schedule alignments. I think the correct question here is why has a perfectly routine version bump for components included in Fedora been submitted as a 'feature'? If GNOME 2.28 is a feature, isn't KDE 4.3 a feature (oh, I see it is too, lovely...), kernel 2.6.31 a feature...every new version of everything in the distro a feature? What benefit does applying the feature process to a routine update like this bring, to offset its clear inconsistency? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
