Re: Fedora 12 Features Proposed for Removal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 11:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:

> Again, that applies to _everything in the distro_. I don't think 'it's a
> new version' can be a feature. If we identify something particular
> within the GNOME or KDE package set which is a significant enough change
> to qualify as a Fedora feature, fine, submit it as such. But just
> declaring the entire version upgrade to be a feature seems a bit weird
> to me.

A good example of the weirdness here - we're declaring KDE 4.3 a 'Fedora
12 feature' (implying it's something sufficiently potentially
problematic that it needs a specific test plan and contingency plan),
yet backporting it to Fedora 10 as an official update meets with
widespread approval and 'nothing wrong with that!' comments...

-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux