On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 12:34:26 -0700 Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: ...snip... > Sure, and I was always happy to write in GNOME and KDE versions as > 'Features' when writing release blurbs for Mandriva. But that's just > pure PR. PR is not all our feature process does - it comes with all > this bureaucracy, intended for dealing with experimental stuff which > may turn out to have been a bad idea, attached to it, it's _not_ a > pure PR exercise. Which leads to the absurdity we have here, the > suggestion that the GNOME 2.28 'feature' should be 'dropped' for > Fedora 12 (does anyone really think we're going to ship it with GNOME > 2.26?) It wasn't a suggestion of that, it was our feature wrangler saying: hey, check these features because they are not showing 100%. Please see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy Do we need to change some policy there? kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
