On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 11:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > But we're providing an operating system, not just a bunch of packages. > What if some group's written their own kernel module for their own > purposes, rolled it out to all their systems, and doesn't expect an > official update to make them re-write it? Same question for KDE - > someone writes a tool for their group based on some KDE libraries, > doesn't expect an update to come along and do a major KDE version bump > and break some interface the tool relied on...reducing the question to > 'are all the packages we care about okay' is, again, excluding some use > cases, i.e. defining an identity for Fedora. We're providing a bunch of packages, that certain groups use to make a variety of operating systems. If you want to develop a tool and expect that it'll keep working on any given release without aggressive changes underneath, pick the Fedora Desktop operating system. If you want to run with the latest and greatest regardless of change risk, try the Fedora KDE operating system. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
