Re: Mono (& Moonlight) Licensing? Revisited

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



King InuYasha wrote:
> I really don't see why you should freak out over Moonlight, if Mono is
> protected, then Moonlight 2 should be protected, since it is a form of
> Mono itself.

Moonlight needs to go to RPM Fusion anyway because it needs to link to
FFmpeg, unless you want to use the proprietary codec pack from M$ (yuck!).
So it's no use arguing about whether Moonlight itself is patent-encumbered
or not.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux