Look at this for more info: http://mono-project.com/License#Patents
Also, regarding Moonlight 2, it is merely a subset of Mono, with some extra APIs suited for it, the only real difference between Moonlight and Mono is codecs. And you don't even have to include those, since Moonlight by default does not require them and can download them automatically when they are needed.
I really don't see why you should freak out over Moonlight, if Mono is protected, then Moonlight 2 should be protected, since it is a form of Mono itself.
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
2009/5/31 Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On 05/31/2009 06:28 PM, Jonathan Underwood wrote:I wasn't asking them to.
>> 2009/5/31 Frank Murphy (Frankly3D) <frankly3d@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>>> http://gregdek.livejournal.com/4008.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Doesn't clarify things for me.
>>
>> Yes, things have changed a fair bit since the OIN was initially set up
>> - most notably the agreements that now exist between MS and Novell.
>> Presumably, since Novell were a key player in the OIN, this now
>> weakens the whole OIN effort, particularly w.r.t mono etc. Looks like
>> this could really do with being revisited by Legal.
>
> If you have specific concerns, take it fedora-legal list. Developers
> cannot give you any legal opinions.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
