Re: Mono (& Moonlight) Licensing? Revisited

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2009/5/31 Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On 05/31/2009 06:28 PM, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
>> 2009/5/31 Frank Murphy (Frankly3D) <frankly3d@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>>> http://gregdek.livejournal.com/4008.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Doesn't clarify things for me.
>>
>> Yes, things have changed a fair bit since the OIN was initially set up
>> - most notably the agreements that now exist between MS and Novell.
>> Presumably, since Novell were a key player in the OIN, this now
>> weakens the whole OIN effort, particularly w.r.t mono etc. Looks like
>> this could really do with being revisited by Legal.
>
> If you have specific concerns, take it fedora-legal list. Developers
> cannot give you any legal opinions.

I wasn't asking them to.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux