Re: Mono (& Moonlight) Licensing? Revisited

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/31/2009 06:28 PM, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> 2009/5/31 Frank Murphy (Frankly3D) <frankly3d@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>> http://gregdek.livejournal.com/4008.html
>>
>>
>> Doesn't clarify things for me.
> 
> Yes, things have changed a fair bit since the OIN was initially set up
> - most notably the agreements that now exist between MS and Novell.
> Presumably, since Novell were a key player in the OIN, this now
> weakens the whole OIN effort, particularly w.r.t mono etc. Looks like
> this could really do with being revisited by Legal.

If you have specific concerns, take it fedora-legal list. Developers
cannot give you any legal opinions.

Rahul

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux