Dennis J. (dennisml@xxxxxxxxxxxx) said: >> At which point, you need some sort of review board, where then every >> package gets something like: >> >> - TuxPaint is rated E for Everyone >> - quake3 is rated T for violent content >> - tcl is rated M for inappropriate language >> >> I'm going to go out on a limb and claim we don't have the resources to >> coherently do this. > > I don't see why we would need a review board. Just add a guideline asking > packagers to tag their packages if they think the contents could be > inappropriate out of courtesy toward their fellow community members. > > If some packagers don't give a damn then that's fine and not a lot can be > done about that but why not give the community the tools to self > regulate? > > Just because there is a general guideline does not mean there has to be > enforcement through an iron-fisted review board. Without some sort of standards, the tags would likely become meaningless to rely on in practice. (See also: the RPM Group tag.) Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
