inode0 wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Florian Festi <ffesti@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
inode0 wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Kushal Das <kushaldas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 6:16 PM, inode0 <inode0@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
True. Someone should ask the question: does it make sense to have
different rules if they prevent the inclusion of useful content and
allow the inclusion of useless code?
Which is useless to me can be very useful to someone else.
That doesn't explain why there is a different standard for content.
It is ok if you know and obey the rules. There is no need for you to
understand why they are in place. Anyway, Fedora is a Linux distribution
(for those who did not yet realize) an though (free) Linux software (that
can be run on Fedora) is what it is all about and content is not (with very
few exceptions). Software yes - content no. I really see no way or reason
why there should be a common standard for both.
"To lead the advancement of free and open source software and content
as a collaborative community."
That is the mission statement of what project?
The Fedora Project with is close but not exactly the same as the Fedora
Linux distribution. If you want to do more for free and open content start a
new sub project or join one of the sub projects that already work on content
(like "Fedora Documentation" or "Fedora Artwork")
Florian
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
