On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Florian Festi <ffesti@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > inode0 wrote: >> >> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Kushal Das <kushaldas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 6:16 PM, inode0 <inode0@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> True. Someone should ask the question: does it make sense to have >>>> different rules if they prevent the inclusion of useful content and >>>> allow the inclusion of useless code? >>> >>> Which is useless to me can be very useful to someone else. >> >> That doesn't explain why there is a different standard for content. > > It is ok if you know and obey the rules. There is no need for you to > understand why they are in place. Anyway, Fedora is a Linux distribution > (for those who did not yet realize) an though (free) Linux software (that > can be run on Fedora) is what it is all about and content is not (with very > few exceptions). Software yes - content no. I really see no way or reason > why there should be a common standard for both. "To lead the advancement of free and open source software and content as a collaborative community." That is the mission statement of what project? John -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
