On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Florian Festi <ffesti@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Chitlesh GOORAH wrote: >> Following your logic, OVM should enter fedora collection as well. !! > > It really doesn't matter how often you repeat a wrong sentence. > > There are different rules that do apply to code and content in Fedora and > OVM got categorized as content and refused by the rules for content. We are > talking about a program here. True. Someone should ask the question: does it make sense to have different rules if they prevent the inclusion of useful content and allow the inclusion of useless code? John -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
