On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 12:50 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > It is not Fedora's place to police *usage* of apps, only whether the > app > or package has a compliant license and follows the defined packaging & > legal rules. If the tool were directly containing support for decoding > such prorietry formats that would be a different matter, because the > codecs would not pass the legal rules. > Then do you find it OK to package up a bunch of packages that provide nothing but gnome or KDE menu entries that launch porn internet sites? What about packages that add bookmarks for these in Firefox (disregarding the fact that Firefox can only have one bookmarks package at this point)? Technically it's "free software", could be packaged within the guidelines, and wouldn't be illegal on the surface, but is this really acceptable things to distribute under the Fedora brand? -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
