On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 01:55:30PM +0200, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote: > On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > If the tool were directly containing support for decoding > > such prorietry formats that would be a different matter, because the > > codecs would not pass the legal rules. > > OVM doesn't directly include any fedora forbidden items as well. It > was refused because there was not enough opensource tools to use it. > It is the same situation here. There's plenty of open source tools to play a variety of video codecs. We just can't ship them. This isn't an equivalent situation. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
