Re: best practices for updates in stable releases (was: Re: OpenOffice 3.1)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2009-05-11, 15:49 GMT, Jud Craft wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 13:03 +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
>> Suggestions on how to "enforce" ?
>
> Lock out developers who don't follow guidelines?  Sanction them?
> Remove their ability to push updates?
>
> No sass meant, I just figured that was a strange rhetorical question.
> Does Fedora really not have any ability to enforce its own guidelines?

Yeah, some of these ... for the really big cock ups suspending of 
packager's rights for some time. After all, it is not an 
universal human right to be able to push to Fedora CVS. Getting 
out of provenpackager group for less outrageous offenses.

Why not?

Matěj

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux