On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:07:07 -0300 Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:23:20AM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > On Sunday, April 26 2009, Kevin Fenzi said: > > > - Is there a unexpected yum behavior here? Or is a virtual > > > provides not allowed in a comps group? > > > > The list of package names in groups of the comps file are just > > that, package names. Provides, filenames, etc are not allowed[1] > this is my bad then. I believe it were perfectly valid. > > Formerly, we were installing qemu-system-x86 and qemu-system-ppc, to > allow for virtualization in both platforms we support kvm. But then > some users were confused about system-ppc being installed in x86... > > We can go back to this scheme if it is better. Personally, I think just installing qemu is probibly fine. You could do as notting suggests and revive a qemu-kvm package, but thats seems pretty late for F11. Can someone modify comps at least so it works for F11? :) kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
