Glauber Costa (glommer@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:23:20AM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > On Sunday, April 26 2009, Kevin Fenzi said: > > > - Is there a unexpected yum behavior here? Or is a virtual provides not > > > allowed in a comps group? > > > > The list of package names in groups of the comps file are just that, > > package names. Provides, filenames, etc are not allowed[1] > this is my bad then. I believe it were perfectly valid. > > Formerly, we were installing qemu-system-x86 and qemu-system-ppc, to allow > for virtualization in both platforms we support kvm. But then some users > were confused about system-ppc being installed in x86... > > We can go back to this scheme if it is better. qemu-kvm could be a virtual package with no files that just Requires: the proper system emulator. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
