On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 20:33 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 10:30 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 13:46 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > <snip> > > Those are all good points - as long as the issues Dave Airlie brought up > > (about how it still identifies itself as g-v-c and hence would > > presumably conflict if both were installed at once) are addressed, I'm > > perfectly happy for the old g-v-c to be used instead. Should we start > > filing bugs for Brian? > > Well, you'd need to do a bit of work on the spec file, but there's > nothing there that wouldn't be straight forward. > > You'd need to remove all the bits you're not interested about (most of > them should be disable-able through configure switches), rename the > binary (and binary name in the desktop file, and schemas), and change > the GETTEXT_PACKAGE so it doesn't conflict with gnome-media. OK. I'll probably be able to look at that Monday, I'll be too busy at the conference for today and tomorrow. -- Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> Red Hat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
