On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 13:46 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > It does have one; it's part of GNOME's git. The git checkout command is > > included as a comment right at the top of the spec. > Oh, code is available. Last code check-in was 4 years ago: > http://git.gnome.org/cgit/gnome-alsamixer/tree/ChangeLog Oh, yeah - I did look at the last checkin dates but didn't notice they were all translations. > > My thinking on that is explained in the bug report. I'd say the old > > g-v-c has less of an upstream, because the old g-v-c effectively doesn't > > exist anywhere except in history. > > It's in the gst-mixer sub-dir of gnome-media: > http://git.gnome.org/cgit/gnome-media/tree/gst-mixer > > It's still the volume control for systems that don't have PulseAudio > like Solaris or *BSDs. > > > Where could it get developed in > > future, if we wanted to push some changes upstream? The new g-v-c is > > effectively a completely different application, it doesn't count as > > 'upstream' for the old g-v-c any more. I don't think you'd be accepting > > patches for the *old* g-v-c into the *new* one :) > > No, but Brian Cameron is maintaining the old gnome-volume-control. Those are all good points - as long as the issues Dave Airlie brought up (about how it still identifies itself as g-v-c and hence would presumably conflict if both were installed at once) are addressed, I'm perfectly happy for the old g-v-c to be used instead. Should we start filing bugs for Brian? -- Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> Red Hat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
