On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 16:41 -0700, Christopher Aillon wrote: > On 04/24/2009 04:36 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > > If they can't mandate this then I suspect the only option left is to > > enact the contingency plan, which neither party seems to want to happen. > > > > So I'm not sure I see the point in you forcing any point. > > The plan is as designed per the feature page. Just some people decided > post-freeze that they don't like it. Or rather didn't fully understand the limited scope of coverage for F11. FESCo isn't mandating anything. In fact after a long and (un)healthy discussion, a compromise for the sake of F11 was reached, one that doesn't require any changes to existing software, only the addition of one package. Comparing it to the Codina fiasco isn't exactly fair. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
