On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 17:15 -0700, Christopher Aillon wrote: > A compromise works best if both parties are on board. I don't believe > that the desktop guys will object to the package existing and being > installable if people want. No CLI needed since we have GUI install > tools. The objection is with the mandate for it to be installed by > default on the desktop live/install spins. See, the Desktop team has no say in whether or not a graphical mixer is available in Fedora. The middle ground between reverting the mixer feature all together and leaving at is it is having a graphical mixer installed by default available in the menus. That was the compromise. If the Desktop team really feels like this wasn't a compromise and it was something mandated and forced, they can raise it to the board level if they wish. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
