On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 17:40 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 17:15 -0700, Christopher Aillon wrote: > > A compromise works best if both parties are on board. I don't believe > > that the desktop guys will object to the package existing and being > > installable if people want. No CLI needed since we have GUI install > > tools. The objection is with the mandate for it to be installed by > > default on the desktop live/install spins. > > See, the Desktop team has no say in whether or not a graphical mixer is > available in Fedora. The middle ground between reverting the mixer > feature all together and leaving at is it is having a graphical mixer > installed by default available in the menus. That was the compromise. > If the Desktop team really feels like this wasn't a compromise and it > was something mandated and forced, they can raise it to the board level > if they wish. > The mandate is for both Desktop/LiveCD spin and Fedora default install, surely the Desktop team does decide for the desktop/livecd spin, but not or the Fedora install. Since I'm sure the KDE spin won't want to include either of these. Dave. > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
