On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 17:15 -0700, Christopher Aillon wrote: > A compromise works best if both parties are on board. I don't believe > that the desktop guys will object to the package existing and being > installable if people want. No CLI needed since we have GUI install > tools. The objection is with the mandate for it to be installed by > default on the desktop live/install spins. *All* parties agreed on the compromise during the meeting, including those speaking on behalf of the desktop group. Approximate quote (since I'm on my laptop and don't have the IRC log handy): "I gave you that if it's what's needed to make this issue go away". Not everyone has to be 100% happy with a compromise (not everyone on the other side of the fence is 100% happy with it either), it just has to be agreed. -- Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> Red Hat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
