Mary Ellen Foster wrote: > So, concretely: should I or shouldn't I rebuild my failing > mono-dependent package to ExcludeArch: ppc now in devel? > > MEF > Don't ExcludeArch. As Jesse says, we'll have to have mono on ppc in the final release. This may mean we revert to an RC or that the current mono gets fixed for ppc. Here's what I think we need to do: I've added the bug report ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494026 ) to the ppc tracker and the F11blocker tracker. * Since mono requires itself to bootstrap, we need to get the last mono version that built on ppc into the buildroot (mono-2_4-9_RC1_fc11) or get bootstrapping binaries back into the mono package temporarily. Jesse, can you take care of that? * Looking at koji, mono stopped building when it jumped from RC1 to RC2. * We need to try building mono-2_4-9_RC1_fc11 (Bumping the release field appropriately) to find out if it's a problem that was introduced in the RC1->RC2 move or something else that changed. David can you coordinate this with Paul? * We can decide where to go from there -- right now we don't have any build logs telling us where things broke so we have very little information to guide us. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
