>>>>> "DN" == David Nielsen writes: [...] DN> Patches welcome, we are not impeding progress and bugfixing on the DN> archs actually can do it on and which users depend on because you DN> demand we do so yet give us no help what so ever when we ask for DN> it. DN> When I suggested we disable PPC temporarily nobody said a thing in DN> protest. You had your chance both to help and to object to the DN> course of action. I think the problem was in this situation that the implications of what you were proposing weren't sufficiently spelt out. I think this was the e-mail where you suggested blocking ppc: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-April/msg00206.html The problem is the subject and/or body should have had a big fat warning like: "all mono-dependent apps such as banshee etc. will also have to be blocked temporarily" to get people's attention above the chaff of the high f-d-l traffic. For example, when I looked at that e-mail I saw the keywords "monodevelop", "blocking", "ppc" and assumed you were probably talking about a single mono package, not the entire stack. If I had realized exactly what was being proposed, I'm sure I and others would have spoken up. Alex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
