On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:49 PM, David Nielsen wrote: > > > 2009/4/8 Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >>>>> Broken deps for ppc >> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>>> avahi-sharp-0.6.24-2.fc11.ppc requires mono(System) = >> >>>>> 0:1.0.5000.0 >> >>>> >> >>>> [cut] >> >>>>> >> >>>>> taglib-sharp-2.0.3.2-2.fc11.ppc requires mono(mscorlib) = >> >>>>> 0:2.0.0.0 >> >>>>> tasque-0.1.8-2.fc11.ppc requires mono-core >> >>>>> tasque-0.1.8-2.fc11.ppc requires mono-data-sqlite >> >>>>> themonospot-0.7.1.1-2.fc11.ppc requires mono-core >= 0:1.2.3 >> >>>>> webkit-sharp-0.2-1.fc11.ppc requires mono(mscorlib) = >> >>>>> 0:1.0.5000.0 >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Why is there a huge number of broken mono dependencies, only in ppc. >> >>>> Did we miss something? >> >>> >> >>> Read further up the mail where is states that mono on ppc has been >> >>> disabled. >> >>> >> >>> Peter >> >> >> >> But first of all, such change (i.e. disabling ppc support on mono >> >> package) >> >> must not be done at this stage where F-11 final freeze comes very soon >> >> (4/14). >> >> If it cannot be done to fix the latest mono package to support ppc >> >> again, >> >> the lastest mono package must be untagged. >> > >> > There has been a number of discussions about this on fedora-devel over >> > the last week or so, check the archives for details. >> > >> >> What I don't understand is, shouldn't such a change that affects >> dozens of packages go through FESCo? If it did, why did we not see an >> announcement with BIG CAPITAL LETTERS with cream on top? > > Not a FESco decision by a mile, it is a bug... patches welcome as always. > You also were warned on -devel, several times in fact that we had this > problem. _Nobody_ with ppc skills volunteered to help actually fix the > problem so now it's disabled till the ppc arch team helps out with a > solution. Nobody on the Mono SIG has the hardware to test this nor the in > depth knowledge about the architecture to fix it. It has been reported to > upstream as well so hopefully we will see this situation mended soon. > > - David > > > Ah... I give up. You guys are right, by doing this update which breaks many packages in an architecture. I'm wrong. Sorry, Orcan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
