> I don't think it would be ignored, however its just hard to express that > in a distro agnostic way. Avoiding hardcoded hacks specifically for > Fedora is one of the goals of anaconda upstream. Perhaps Anaconda (or Yum?) should have a slight refactoring of the way it handles repositories. It could be able to flag a repository as a "subset" of another repository (DVD <= Main), and one repository as dependent on another. (Updates -> Main). Then, enabling Updates should automatically enable Main. But since Main is just a superset of DVD, yum (or Anaconda) know to use DVD packages whenever present to cut the install time. This could be yum logic (lot of refactoring there, upstream changes, maybe a bad idea) or perhaps just logic on the Anaconda side at the select-repository-screen. Anaconda could just handle the subset logic itself using yum costs in a way to prefer the subset repository first. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
