Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> drago01 wrote:

[...]

> > Did it ever happen that a "provenpackager" or any packager in the days
> > of open ACLs cause any real damage to packages (not owned by him)?
> > I am not aware of any such cases, it seems to me that we are trying to
> > solve a non existing problem.

Perhaps the packager community has grown a lot since then?

> I'm simply trying to think of a solution for both sides -
> paranoic-about-security and believe-in-good-will.

The problem is that what you as a packager prefer does impact _all_
users. And in such a situation you should prefer to fall to the paranoic
side.
-- 
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                   User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica                    Fono: +56 32 2654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria             +56 32 2654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 2340000       Fax:  +56 32 2797513

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux