On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > He suggested a little more than that and no I don't believe this would > be a positive result for Fedora. (even assuming enough community > packagers could be found to replace the existing packagers) Interesting, that you believe knowing more than me as writer of the text ;) If a downstream and upstream maintainer wants to focus on upstream rather on downstream, he/she/it could look for a new maintainer and itself step down getting just co-maintainer - especially if he/she/it is not interested in enhancing own RPM packaging skills (which is strange for a packager). Very similar to this is just to look for a co-maintainer and let him/her do more packaging work rather bugfixing and upstream <-> downstream handling. And to repeat myself once more: We still need more quality rather quantity in Fedora - this also affects packaging. Greetings, Robert -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
