On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 06:48:22AM -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > Robert Scheck wrote: > > > You are not blocking them, if you do nothing. But you would block them, if > > you would refuse suggestions or pointings to the Guidelines. There were > > (are?) reviews, where a patch and/or a full formal review has been done, > > but the maintainer never has shown up or just told "no, I won't do that, I > > am upstream". That is blocking and/or refusing. I mentioned examples for > > exactly such cases in my previous e-mails and Paul is also aware of them > > (at least he was, when I told him that 6 months ago). > > Well, that just makes no sense. In those cases you should follow up with > Fedora leadership to resolve it. He has, and Spot and I are working on the merge review issue with the different Red Hat teams internally. We've given the team managers a number of different options to consider, and right now Spot's in the process of locating a selection of packages we can concentrate on to make some progress. We're trying to balance out our desire to get these merge reviews completed with the fact that most of the engineers in question labor under a constant, heavy workload that includes a great deal of maintenance work for RHEL 4 and 5. > All I'm asking you is to NOT extend that to all "RH guys" (that > expression is sexist btw). Hear, hear. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
pgp6K8PC2asrQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
