Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Donnerstag, den 29.01.2009, 08:55 +0100 schrieb drago01:

> Did it ever happen that a "provenpackager" or any packager in the days
> of open ACLs cause any real damage to packages (not owned by him)?
> I am not aware of any such cases, it seems to me that we are trying to
> solve a non existing problem.

I do recall a case where a proven packager wanted to fix something in
one of my packages but made an error that needed to be reverted by
another proven packager an hour later. I don't know if you call this
"real damage", but it shows that proven packagers are not perfect.

Regards,
Christoph



-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux