Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:40:43AM +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Do RH employes have sponsors too? A lot of the bad reviews are done by
> RH people and a lot of bad specs come from RH folks. Somebody pointed me
> to:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433678
> and I had a quick glance over it before Andreas added his comments:
>       * no list of tests that have been run
>       * SourceURL is missing

What about fixing rpmlint to check for missing tags? Just now it simply
ignores them, but, on the other side, checks such _very important_
things as mixing tabs and spaces, that certainly have great impact on
functionality of the package.

Regards,
David

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux