>>>>> "JS" == Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> writes: JS> Can you explain why you are rebuilding fedora-release? Because I need to replace the set of repos contained within that package. JS> I thought we provided generic-release package so that you don't JS> have to rebuild fedora-release as part of customization. Doing that buys me nothing. Because fedora-relase contains more than just the repos, I have to start with the base package for each release or I risk missing out on things like system-release-cpe or changes in the way keys are handled. So I would still have to check fedora-release out of CVS, copy the bits somewhere, modify it for my custom stuff, and build it. That's actually another step over just doing the checkout, patching the fedora-release spec and doing make noarch. Either way I'm rebuilding fedora-release. If the only issue is whether I rename the package, I'm not going to bother. Now, if the repos would be split out so that I can provide my own without having to mess with fedora-release, then that would be ideal but my use case is pretty narrow so I can understand why the suggestion did not manage any traction. - J< -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
